Mobility / Visits

Please choose one of the following documentation sections:

4.1.	SEFES Meetings	4.1.1.	Meeting I Hamburg
		4.1.2.	Meeting II Kaunas
		4.1.3.	Meeting III Rzeszow
		4.1.4.	Meeting IV Reykjavik
		4.1.5.	Meeting V Rovaniemi
		4.1.6	Meeting VI Hamburg
4.2.	Individual Visits	4.2.1.	Asta and Rima visit to Rzeszow
		4.2.2.	Rima visit to Reykjavik
		4.2.3.	Sabine visit to Rzeszow
4.3.	Courses And Conferences	4.3.1.	Sequals Course
		4.3.2.	Synevanet conference in Hall 2005 (PPT)
		4.3.3.	Synevanet conference in Talinn 2006
		4.3.5.	Action Research (PPT)

---

Meeting II - Kaunas

Meeting in Kaunas March 31 to April 3 2004.

Program:

31 March: arrival, introduction

1 April: Meeting

2 April: Meeting and excursions.

3. April: Departure

Summary:

New participants:

New participants in the project took part in the meeting, Sólveig from Reykjavík and Ruta from Kaunas. Sólveig teaches IT and Ruta German.

Work planned for this year:

1. Diary – carry on answering specific questions.

2. Peer-evaluation at home according to the same aspect as in the diary. The diary will be used as a platform for the peer-evaluation.

3. Prepare a template for the report in connection to school-visits.

4. Developing futhter quick-evaluation.

A) Diary and peer evaluation – themes to base questions on:

Activity:

a. How many and which one have I activated?

b. How did I activate them?

c. How many did speak?

d. Whom did I reach?

Attention - need to listen to each other:

a. How many where listening?

b. Did they pay attention to each other arguments/ presentation?

c. How do we create the right atmosphere?

Discipline problems:

a. what is a discipline problem for me? f.x. coming late to a class, mobile phone is ringing, drinking and eating etc.

b. how do you define discipline?

c. how did you handle (react to) this problem?

Success factors:

a. what were the success factors in this paticular lesson?

b. what makes a lesson successful?

c. what makes me happy about a lesson?

B) Student´s feedback – teacher´s view:

a. use instruments of quick evaluation

b. three aspects (frame) – same aspects as in A.

c. Compare A and B.

d. Method:

i. questionaire

ii. blogging

iii. know your position – point of view

Quick evaluation:

Methode:

-es muss kurz sein (nicht zu viel Zeit nehmen)

-die Gerechtigkeit dieser Methode (Standpunkt)

-Zwei Phasen: die erste Phase bewegung und die zweite Phase die Position veraendern.

-Fragebogen

Methods:

a. it must be quick

b. two phases, first there is movement and then you evaluate a changed position

c. questionaires

Different approaches:

-traffic light (red, yellow and green)

-2 Saetze-Methode

-3 things that helped ... and/or 3 things that hindered ...

-target

-position

-questionaires

-Blogging

Who will do what:

All schools will continue with diary and do some peer-evaluation.

One aspect is enough in the diary (activity, discipline and attention)

international partner-command

Students´feedback

Lithauen:

-Fragebogen (Ruta, Rima and Asta)

-Target (Rima, Asta)

-Standpunkt (Ruta)

Poland:

-Fragebogen (Mary, Gosha, Aga)

-Target (Mary)

-Standpunkt (Aga, Gosha)

Iceland:

-Web diary

-Standpunkt (Jon Ingvar)

-Fragebogen (Jon Ingvar, Solveig o.fl.)

Germany:

-Standpunkt (Sabine)

-Target (Angelika, Werner)

-Fragebogen (Alle)

Results of students´feedback – take them to the meeting.

The methods should be tested at least two times.

Two lesson of peer-evaluation.

October the 20th until 24th.

Comenius III

-meetings

-external and internal evaluation

W. Maass