Peer Evaluation

Rzeszow

Please choose one of the documentation items below:

3.1.	Feedback
3.2.	Peer Evaluation	3.2.1.	Hamburg
		3.2.2.	Kaunas
		3.2.3.	Reykjavik
		3.2.4.	Rovaniemi
		3.2.5.	Rzeszow	a)	Mock Exam
				b)	Teacher Trainee's Observation
3.3.	Diary
3.4.	Photo Evaluation
3.5.	Diverse

---

CATHOLIC GRAMMAR SCHOOL ( general academic profile)

MOCK ORAL EXAM AS A WAY OF STUDENTS-TEACHER EVALUATION

AND PEER EVALUATION  before final exams

Objectives

The main objective of the mock oral exam in our school is to assess students’ achievements and  provide the teachers with peer-evaluation before final examinations. As a form of on-going assessment and teachers’ evaluation it inspires innovations in these fields. It is also supposed to encourage teachers’ cooperation in the field of evaluation. The last but not least important aim of the mock oral exam is to help students overcome stress which may negatively influence their performance during a proper exam. During the mock exam they are exposed to  the real-like atmosphere of the final exam. Finally, the mock exam gives the Principal and the teachers involved the idea of how the students performance corresponds with the final grades in a given subject

Method

The teacher of a group of students cannot examine their own group, so two teachers swap their groups and examine each other’s students. This kind of peer – evaluation is carried out simultaneously with assessing students’ (ss) achievements.  Students of the group 1 (G1) are examined by the teacher of  the group 2 (T2) and respectively,  students of the group 2(G2) are examined by the teacher of the group 1 (T1). At the same time T1 observes and takes notes of the  T2’s  performance on the special evaluation-report sheet. After the mock exam both teachers carry out  mutual evaluation of their work. They also analyze ss’ expected level and  their actual performance paying extra attention to those areas of  exam preparation which need additional work on. Finally, on the basis of the conclusions drawn suggestions are made for he future work with the ss.

EVALUATION- REPORT  SHEET

Main skills tested:

-ability to communicate,

-ability to provide required information,

-ability to express opinion,

-ability to interpret visual material,

-ability to conduct discussion

Student’s name	Tasks	Contents	Ss’ achievements (points)
1. Jaś Kowalski	-asking for & giving info.
	-reporting past evens
	-negotiating
	-describing stimuli-based material
	-interpreting
	-giving opinions
			Grade: …………..

General comments

………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………

Final  conclusions

………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………