Feedback

Rzeszow

Please choose one of the documentation items below:

3.1.	Feedback	3.1.1.	Hamburg
		3.1.2.	Kaunas
		3.1.3.	Reykjavik
		3.1.4.	Rovaniemi
		3.1.5.	Rzeszow

3.2.	Peer Evaluation
3.3.	Diary
3.4.	Photo Evaluation
3.5.	Diverse

GRADUATES’ FEEDBACK

for the purpose of evaluation and assessment

Objective
School and teachers’ assessment.
General evaluation of teachers’ work effectiveness and thorough preparation ofstudents for matriculation examinations and further education.
Method
During a last year graduates’ meeting the graduates are asked to fill in a questionnaire (enclosed below).
Analysis of the questionnaires.
Comments.
Conclusions.
Implementing changes in plans for further work.

GRADUATE’S FEEDBACK QUESTIONNAIRE

Name of your current university/ college:……………………..

Kind of studies: ………………………………………….

1. What subjects did you choose for the matriculation examination ?

Circle the points on 1-5 scale to determine the degree of your preparation you received in our school ( 5 being the highest score)

-written - oral

………………………1 2 3 4 5 ………………………1 2 3 4 5

………………………1 2 3 4 5

2. How useful for your matriculation exam and further studies was the selection of the

materials used by the teacher during the lessons?

Subject:

…………………………………………………1 2 3 4 5

3. What area of teaching was neglected most while most needed?

………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………….

4. Which subject/ teacher influenced your choice of your current studies most? Why?

5. Would you recommend our school to your friends? Why? Why not?