Self Evaluation For European Schools (SEFES)

Feedback

Rovaniemi

Please choose one of the documentation items below:

3.1. Feedback 3.1.1. Hamburg
3.1.2. Kaunas
3.1.3. Reykjavik
3.1.4. Rovaniemi a) Course Feedback
b) Annual Feedback
c) On-The-Job-Learning (PPT)
d) Activity Target
e) Discipline Target
3.1.5. Rzeszow
3.2. Peer Evaluation
3.3. Diary
3.4. Photo Evaluation
3.5. Diverse

LAPLAND
VOCATIONAL GOLLACE

Service Sector

COURSE FEEDBACK

Course ___/

Course name:_____________________________________                                  

Group:________________

1.       Which aspects in the realization of the course were positive?

______________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________

2.       What could be done different and how?

______________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________

3.       Course feedback                 

++

+

0

-

--

I totally

agree

I agree to

some extent

I agree as much as I disagree

I disagree to

some extent

I totally

disagree

The objectives of the course were made clear

I learned many new things

I achieved my own objectives well

The teacher was competent in his/her field

The teacher was good at teaching

The teacher was inspiring

There was a positive atmosphere in class

The course assignments enhanced the learning process

I participated actively in class

I acquired the necessary course materials (e.g. cook’s hat, book)[1]

I attended every session

I did my homework

4.       Final comments

______________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________

THANK YOU!



[1] If there was no additional material required for the course, the question can be ignored.